The Top 3 Things CPS Does When Plotting To Remove Your Children!

 Why CPS Plotting To Remove Your Children!

A former child protective services worker shares her viewpoint on the structure, the complexity of operating inside it, and its paternalistic excesses in the reader correspondence that follows. A woman who claims the system protected her from an abusive father questions the narrative that the safety of children by CPS is over-aggressive. And a father being prosecuted for child abuse claims that he was radicalized by the experience.

Next, a woman's experiences whose work included taking children away from their parents:

It seems like in the media there is often some kind of story about one type of child abuse or neglect or another. I have recently come across two such stories, one about a working mother who allowed her nine-year-old daughter to play unattended on a playground near her job and was subsequently arrested and placed into foster care for her daughter; and another, in fact, about the mass shutdown of water services in a deprived Detroit community that raised the fact that many do not complain about the issue For me, these stories really hit home. I previously worked for Children's Protective Services in Ohio, in addition to becoming a mom.

As a CPS worker, you were either accused of doing too little to protect the children involved or of being too intrusive, at best another mindless bureaucrat and at worst a power-happy sadist who stepped off to tell others how to raise their children. Opinions typically fall into one of two predictable camps. In fact, both are often right. I've personally seen them. And that's a problem. However, most employees fall somewhere in the broad continuum between them, and where they fall, their local inter-and-intra-agency community would be more affected than any law.

Thinking of the 9-year-old 's mother, I remember I'm not familiar with the case's information. I realize that a lot I don't know is there. Things such as does this mother have a history of abusing or neglecting this child or other kids? Did the child have any special needs that made her particularly prone to being unsupervised? Has the child had some other symptoms of violence, such as serious bruises or physical damage, or neglect, such as evident malnutrition or persistent head lice, or an incalculable amount of other things? This will definitely have a major effect on my understanding of the case, but as it stands, what I read is this: a 9-year-old girl was left in a playground near the workplace of her mother with ample shade and access to water with a mobile phone. An adult called the police upon finding that her mother was not present. So far, I have vilified neither the caller nor the police for responding. It is what happens next that I query strongly.

Apparently, the appropriate solution to this circumstance was to remove the child from the custody of her mother, place her in foster care, and arrest the mother. I'm going to be blunt: that's nuts.

I agree that an investigation to ensure that the child is properly taken care of is not an entirely bad idea, and I can also agree that other arrangements would be best for the care of the daughter when mom is at work. However, without taking the child from her home and definitely without arresting the mother, this can be done (which, frankly, just seems asinine to me). Indeed, it may not be exclusively appropriate to perform a full investigation, depending on whether any other signs of violence or neglect were present. CPS (dependent on the laws of that particular state) would have been able to alert the mother and provide her with assistance in seeking affordable or even subsidized childcare. Jobs with CPS normally have some latitude. This is not always a choice, depending on the state, though.

But even if an inquiry is launched, if a parent claims that when they are at work they have no access to childcare, guess who can help? Services for Youngsters. Or have we forgotten that they are, truly, services? The employees, not mini-cops or pseudo-judges, are social service employees. It is a great deal of authority to be able to expel a child from their home and relatives, to forbid or warrant control of communication between family members, to legally terminate the right of a parent to their child.

This is why reading about the Detroit water shut-off crisis impacting upward of 100,000 lower-income residents with past-due bills was so personally troubling. The argument that hit home for me, as sad as it is, was that too many do not mention their concerns or ask for help because they fear their kids will be expelled from their home for lack of water. This looks, superficially, well, sound. In order to survive, you need water. But think about it more deeply and you see the ridiculousness of this strategy.

#lawyer, #attorney, #immigration lawyer, #lawyers near me, #personal injury lawyer, #divorce lawyer, #car accident lawyer, #divorce lawyers, #bankruptcy attorney, #law firm, #barrister, #divorce attorney, #family law, #divorce lawyers near me, #solicitor, #employment law, #real estate attorney, #family law attorney, #immigration lawyer near me, #personal injury attorney, #real estate lawyer, #injury lawyer, #business law, #accident lawyer, #criminal defense attorney, #divorce attorney near me, #david boies, #attorney at law, #bankruptcy lawyer, #law office, #corporate law, #law firms near me, #car accident attorney, #immigration attorney, #tax attorney, #workers comp lawyer, #bankruptcy lawyers near me, #malpractice lawyer, #medical malpractice lawyer, #employment attorney, #family lawyer near me, #accident attorney, #michael avenatti Nike, #estate planning attorney, #probate lawyer, #tax lawyer, #injury attorney, #medical malpractice attorney, #law offices near me, #dui lawyer